Halfway Between Protection and Competition: The “Repair Clause” After the Recent Reform of the EU Design Acquis. Next Stepsfor the Spanish Legal Framework

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36151/RPIID.2025.2.3.01

Keywords:

design, intellectual property, industrial design, complex products, components, repair, spare parts, limitations

Abstract

The recent reform of the EU legislation for the protection of designs entailed culminating successfully a longstanding debate over the extent of protection of component parts of complex products under a design law system thanks to the adoption of the so-called “repair clause” in the Design Directive, which is formally a limitation to the rights attributed to the holder of the Design that allows the use of the design by third parties for the purpose of repair. This article will analyze the remit of the provision as finally adopted and its complex legislative history, and will outline the potential way forward for Spain to incorporate the repair clause to the Spanish relevant legislation, which is the Act 20/2003, of 7th july, for the legal protection of designs.

References

APLIN, T., DAVIS, J., Intellectual Property Law. Text, cases and materials. 2n ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.

ASO, T., RADEMACHER, C., DOBINSON, J. (eds.), History of Design and Design Law. An international and interdisciplinary perspective. Springer, Singapore, 2022.

BAINBRIDGE, D.I., Intellectual Property, 10th ed., Pearson, Londres, 2018.

BEEBE, B., “Design Protection” in DREYFUSS, R.C. AND PILA, J.: The Oxford Handbook of Intellectual Property Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 572 a 593.

BELDIMAN, D., BLANKE-ROESER, C.: “European Design Law: Considerations relating to protection of spare parts for restoring a complex product’s original appearance”, IIC, 46, (2015), 915 a 919.

BELDIMAN, D., BLANKE-ROESER, C., An international perspective on Design Protection of Visible Spare Parts, Springer, 2017.

BELDIMAN, D., BLANKE-ROESER, C., TISCHNER, A.: “Spare parts and Design Protection– different approaches to a common problem. Recent developments from the EU and US perspective”, GRUR International, 69, 7 (2020), pp. 673 a 692. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa081

BERCOVITZ RODRÍGUEZ-CANO, A., Apuntes de Derecho Mercantil, 18ª ed., Aranzadi, Pamplona, 2017.

BONADIO, E. y otros, “Copyright and Designs– a renewed relationship”, Report of the Global Digital Encounter 28 FIDE-TIPSA, 2023), pp. 1 a 13, https://thinkfide.com/wpcontent/uploads/2023/07/Final-Report-GDE-28-Copyright-and-designs-%E2%80%93-a-renewed-relationship.pdf

BOTANA AGRA, M.: “Las normas sustantivas del A. ADPIC (TRIP’s) sobre los derechos de propiedad intelectual”, ADI, 16, (1995), pp. 109 a 162.

BRTKA, R., OP DE NEECK, D.: “EU design laws: changes on the horizon”, European Intellectual Property Review 45, 8, (2023) pp. 463 a 471.

CERDÁ ALBERO, F.: “Diseño industrial: protección jurídica en España y perspectivas en la Comunidad Europea”, Revista General de Derecho, 595 (1994), pp. 3669 a 3715.

CORNISH, W., LEWELLYN, D., APLIN, T., Intellectual Property: patents, copyright, trademarks and allied rights, 8.ª ed., Thompson Reuters, Londres, 2013.

CORNISH, W., LIDDELL, K., “The origins and structure of the TRIPS Agreement” en ULLRICH, H. et al.: TRIPS plus 20. From Trade Rules to Market Principles. ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2016, pp. 3 a 51.

CORNWELL, J.: “Under-referred, under-reasoned, under-resourced? Re-examining EU design law before the Court of Justice and the General Court”, Intellectual Property Quaterly, 4, 4 (2016), pp. 318 a 351.

CORNWELL, J.: “Nintendo v BigBen and Acacia v Audi: design exceptions at the CJEU”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 14, 1 (2018), pp. 51 a 61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpy116

CRUZ GONZÁLEZ, M.: “Algunas reflexiones en torno a la naturaleza híbrida de las creaciones de forma y su tutela material”, Revista Electrónica de Direito RED, 33, 1, (2024), pp. 79 a 104.

DERCLAYE, E., “Doceram, Cofemel and Brompton: how does the current and future CJUE case law affect digital designs”, en PASA, B. (ed.): Il design, l’innovazione tecnologica e digitale, Un dialogo interdisciplinare per un ripensamento delle tutele – Design, technological and digital innovation. Interdisciplinary proposals for reshaping legal protections, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane 2020, pp. 1 a 17. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3507802

DOMÍNGUEZ PÉREZ, E.M.: “La protección jurídica del diseño industrial: la novedad y el carácter singular. Reflexiones en torno al Proyecto de Ley de protección jurídica del diseño industrial”, ADI, 23 (2002), pp. 87 a 111.

DREXL, J., HILTY, R. M., KUR, A.: “Design protection for spare parts and the Commission’s proposal for a repairs clause”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 36, 4 (2005), pp. 448 a 457.

FERNÁNDEZ-NÓVOA, C., OTERO LASTRES, J.M., BOTANA AGRA, M., Manual de la Propiedad Industrial, 3rd ed., Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2017.

FIRTH, A., “Repairs, interconnections and consumer Welfare in the field of Design” in HEATH, C., KAMPERMAN SANDERS, A. (eds.): Spares, Repairs and Intellectual Property Rights, Kluwer International, The Hague, 2009, pp. 147 a 180.

FRANKEL, S., GERVAIS, D. J., Advanced introduction to international Intellectual Property. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016.

GAY, A., SAMAR, L., El Diseño Industrial en la historia. Ediciones TEC, Córdoba, 2007.

GIL CELEDONIO, J. A.: “Una solidaridad de hecho: la configuración del sistema europeo de marcas”, Anuario de la Facultad de Derecho. Universidad de Extremadura, 38 (2022), pp. 479 a 501. https://doi.org/10.17398/2695-7728.38.479

GIL CELEDONIO, J. A., “La reforma del régimen jurídico para la protección de los diseños industriales en Europa: principales elementos de una (esperada) innovación normativa” in CANDELARIO MACÍAS, M.I. (dir.): Los nuevos horizontes y metas de la propiedad industrial. Aranzadi, Las Rozas, 2024, pp. 147 a 177.

GIL CELEDONIO, J. A.: “El Tratado de Riad sobre Derecho de los diseños (DLT) y su contribución al sistema internacional para la protección de la propiedad industrial e intelectual”, Revista de Propiedad Intelectual e Innovación Digital, 2 (1), (2025), pp. 71 a 98. https://doi.org/10.36151/RPIID.2025.2.1.03

GIMENO, L.: ‘Spare parts in Spain and from a European perspective’, European Intellectual Property Review 19 (1997), pp. 537 a 544.

GÓMEZ SEGADE, J. A.: “Panorámica de la nueva ley española de diseño industrial”, ADI, 24, (2003), pp. 29 a 52.

HARTWIG, H.: “Protection of car designs in Europe – some observations from a practitioner’s perspective”, ERA-Forum 11, 3, (2010), pp. 439 a 458.

HARTWIG, H.: “Spare parts under European design and trade mark law”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 11, 2, (2016), pp. 121 a 129. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpv229

HARTWIG, H.: ‘Evaluation of EU legislation on design protection’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17 (2023), pp. 107 a 112. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab173

HERZ, B., MEJER, M.: “The effect of design protection on price and price dispersion: evidence from automotive spare parts”, International Journal of Industrial Organization 79, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2021.102776

HOLTON, A.: “European Design Law and the spare parts dilemma: the proposed regulation and Directive”, European Intellectual Property Review 16 2, (1994), pp. 51 a 57.

IAIA, V.: “The elephant in the room of EU copyright originality: time to unpack and harmonize the essential requirement of copyright’, Journal of World Intellectual Property, 28 (2025), pp. 471 a 490. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12343

IZYUMENKO, E: ‘Intellectual Property in the age of environmental crisis: how trademarks and copyright challenge the human right to a healthy environment’, IIC, 55, (2024), pp. 864 a 900.

JÄNICH, V. M.: “Perspectives on the relationship between copyright and Design Law after Cofemel/G-star– The Australian regulation of copyright/design overlap as a Role model for European Law?”, GRUR International 72 (2023), pp. 451 a 457.

KAPYRINA, N.: “Limitations in the field of Designs”, IIC, 49, 1 (2017), pp. 1 a 22.

KINGSBURY, A.: “International harmonisation of designs law: the case for diversity”, European Intellectual Property Review, 8, (2010), pp. 382 a 395.

KUR, A., “Limiting IP protection for competition policy reasons”, in DREXL, J. (ed.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2008, pp. 313 a 345. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848443853.00024

KUR, A., “Twenty Tears in Design Law– What has changed?”, in BOSHER, H., ROSATI, E.: Developments and Directions in Intellectual Property Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2023, pp. 145 a 160.

KUR, A., DREIER, T., European Intellectual Property Law. Text, Cases and Materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013.

KUR, A., ENDRICH-LAIMBÖCK, T., HUCKSCHLAG, M., Position statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition of 23 January 2023 on the “Design Package.

KUR, A., GYÖRGY, A., “Protection of spare parts in design law: a comparative analysis”, en HARTWIG, H. (ed.): Research Handbook on Design Law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 202, pp. 304 a 344. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781955888.00020

KUR, A., LEVIN, M., “The design approach revisited: background and meaning”, in KUR, A., LEVIN, M. and SCHOVSBO, J.: The EU Design Approach. A global appraisal. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2018, pp. 1 a 27. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785364143.00007

LAHORE, J.: “Harmonization of Design Laws in the European Communities: the copyright dilemma”, Common Market Law Review, 20, 2 (1983), pp. 233 a 268.

LENCE REIJA, C.: “La propuesta de Directiva sobre la protección del diseño: el freno de la cláusula de reparación” ADI 18 (1997), pp. 1013 a 1022.

LENCE REIJA, C., La protección del diseño en el derecho español. Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2004.

LOUREDO CASADO, S.: “Análisis de las modificaciones previstas en la legislación de diseño industrial a nivel europeo”, ADI, 43 (2023), pp. 133 a 155.

MARGONI, T.: “Not for designers. On the inadequacies of EU Design Law and how to fix it”, JIPITEC, 4, 3 (2013), pp. 225 a 248.

MEZEI, P. y HÄRKÖNEN, H., “A primer to intellectual property law and Upcycling”, (forthcoming), pp. 1 a 30. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5298352

MUSKER, D., “Community design regulation. Art. 3” in GIELEN, C., VON BOMHARD, V.: Concise trademark and design Law. Wolters Kluwer, The Hague, 2011.

OZTURKCAN, S.: “The right-to-repair movement: sustainability and consumer rights” Journal of Information Technology Teaching Classes, 14, 2, (2024), pp. 217 a 223. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438869231178037

PILA, J., TORREMANS, P., European Intellectual Property Law. 2nd ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2019.

PIHLAJARINNE, T., “Repairing and re-using from an exclusive rights perspective– towards sustainable lifespan as part of a new normal?’” in ROGNSTAD, O. and ØRSTAVIK, I. B. (eds.): Intellectual Property and Sustainable Markets. Edward Elgar, 2021, pp. 81 a 100. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901351.00010

PIRES DE CARVALHO, N., The TRIPS regime of trademarks and designs. Ed. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2014.

POSNER, R. A.: “Intellectual Property: the law and economics approach”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 2 (2005), pp. 57 a 73.

QUAEDVLIEG, A., “Protection of industrial designs: a twenty-first-century challenge for WIPO” in RICKETSON, S. (ed.): Research Handbook on the World Intellectual Property Organization. The first 50 years and Beyond, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, pp. 171 a 190.

ROSATI, E.: “Should the EU unify copyright laws?”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 19, (2024), pp. 621 a 622.

SENFTLEBEN, M., “Overprotection and protection overlaps in Intellectual Property Law– the need for horizontal fair use defences”, in KUR, A. y MIZARAS, V. (eds.): The structure of Intellectual Property Law: can one size fit all?, Edward Elgar, Chentelham, 2011, pp. 136 a 181. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931542.00016

SCHOVSBO, J., DINWOODIE, G.B., “Design protection for products that are dictated by function” in KUR, A., LEVIN, M. and SCHOVSBO, J.: The EU Design Approach. A global appraisal. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2018, pp. 142 a 171.

SPEYART, H. M. H.: “The grand design: an update on the E.C. design proposals, following the adoption of a Common Position on the Directive”, European Intellectual Property Review 19 (1997), pp. 603 a 612.

SUTHERSANEN, U.: “Breaking down the intellectual property barriers”, Intellectual Property Quaterly, 3, (1998), pp. 267 a 294.

SUTHERSANEN, U., Design Law: European Union and USA. 2nd edition, Sweet and Maxwell, London, 2010.

SUTHERSANEN, U., “Function, art and fashion: do we need the EU design law? in GEIGER, C. (ed.): Constructing European Intellectual Property. Achievements and new perspectives, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013, pp. 355 a 382.

SVENSSON, S., RICHTER, J.L., MAITRE-EKERN, E. and others, The emerging “right to repair” legislation in the EU and the US. Paper presented at Going Green CARE INNOVATION, 2018.

STONE, D., European Union Design Law. A Practitioner’s Guide. 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016.

TISCHNER, A., “Chopping off Hydra’s Heads: Spare parts in EU Design and Trade Mark Law”, in BRUNN, N., DINWOODIE, G.B., LEVIN, M., OHLY, A. (eds.): Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law. Essays in Honour of Annette Kur. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020, pp. 392 a 404.

TISCHNNER, A. and KSTASIUK, K.: “Spare Parts, Trade Marks and consumer understanding”, IIC 54 (2023), pp. 26 a 60.

TOMITSCH, M., BATY, S., Designing Tomorrow, Bis Publisher, Amsterdam, 2023.

VOLKEN, B., “Requirements for design protection: global commonalities”, in HARTWIG, H.: Research Handbook on Design Law, ed. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2021, pp. 1 a 29.

VON BOMHARD, V., VON MÜHLENDAHL, A., Concise European Design Law, Kluwer Law International, 2023.

VRENDENBARG, C. J.S.: “Durable design: what role for EU Design Law in the green transition?”, GRUR International, 74, 6, (2025), pp. 525 a 531. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaf052

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

Issue

Section

Estudios

How to Cite

Halfway Between Protection and Competition: The “Repair Clause” After the Recent Reform of the EU Design Acquis. Next Stepsfor the Spanish Legal Framework. (2025). Revista Propiedad Intelectual E innovación Digital, 2(3), 13-50. https://doi.org/10.36151/RPIID.2025.2.3.01