Trademark against public order and good customs before the application for the registration of the trademark "Pablo Escobar"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36151/RPIID.2024.1.1.05Keywords:
European Union trademark, public order, accepted principles of morality, Absolute ground for refusalAbstract
The recent judgment of the General Court of the European Union of April 17, 2024 introduces new elements for the interpretation and application of the concepts of public order and good customs following an application for the registration of the trademark "Pablo Escobar". Both the Board of Appeal and the General Court agreed that the association of Pablo Escobar's name with drug trafficking and narco-terrorism prevails over any possible positive connotation, which leads to perceiving the mark applied for as contrary to fundamental values and moral standards in Spanish society. Likewise, the common position at the European Union level is shared that distinguishing signs related to criminal activities or organizations, such as, for example, should be rejected as being considered contrary to public policy and morality since, otherwise, the trademark may be perceived by the relevant public as directly contrary to the fundamental values and moral standards accepted by European Union society in the European Union. At the same time, it may contradict or incite, glorify, trivialize or justify the violation of the rules, principles or fundamental values of the societies of the European Union.
References
DA SILVA PASSOS, R., “El Tribunal General declara que la marca “La Mafia se sienta a la mesa” es contraria al orden público”, La Ley Unión Europea, 58 (2018) (consultada en legalteca).
FERNÁNDEZ-NÓVOA RODRÍGUEZ, C., “Capítulo XXX. Prohibiciones absolutas” en Manual de la Propiedad Industrial, Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2009, pp. 519-558.
FERNÁNDEZ-NÓVOA RODRÍGUEZ, C., “La prohibición de registrar como marcas los signos contrarios al orden público o a las buenas costumbres”, ADI, 36, (2015-2016), pp. 39-12.
KITCHIN, D., LLEWELYN, D., MELLOR, J., MEADE, R., MOODY-STUART, T., Kerly’s Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names, Sweet and Maxwell, 2001, London, p.201.
KUR A., SENFTLEBEN, M., European Trade Mark Law. A Commentary, Oford University Press, 2017, p. 173.
LOBBATO, M., Comentario a la Ley 17/2001, de Marcas, Aranzadi, 2007, Cizur Menor, p.263.
MARCO ARCALÁ, L.A., “Prohibiciones absolutas”, en AAVV, Comentarios a la Ley de marcas, dir. A. Bercovitz/A. García Cruces, 2ª ed., T. I, Cizur Menor, 2008, p. 135 ss.
MARCO ARCALÁ, L.A., “Signos ofensivos y signos de escaso gusto en la Jurisprudencia comunitaria reciente (Comentario a la STG [Sala Primera] T-417/10, Federico Cortés del Valle López c. OAMI, de 9 de marzo de 2012 (Caso “¡Que buenu ye! HIJOPUTA”)”, ADI, 32 (2011-2012), p. 625 ss.
RUIZ MUÑOZ, M. “Signos contrarios a la Ley, al orden público o a las buenas costumbres”. Revista de derecho de la competencia y la distribución. N.º 26, (2020), pp. 2-26.
TATO PLAZA, A., “Libertad de expresión y prohibición de registro de marcas contrarias al orden público o a las buenas costumbres” Indret: Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, ISSN-e 1698-739X, N.º. 1, 2020, pp.1-27.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista propiedad intelectual e innovación digital

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.